The New Technocracy

The coronavirus “pandemic” has brought a new group of technocratic leaders to the forefront. For those of you that do not know what a TECHNOCRACY is, view the definition (as stated in Wikipedia) below:

Technocracy is an ideological system of governance in which decision-makers are selected on the basis of their expertise in a given area of responsibility, particularly with regard to scientific or technical knowledge. This system explicitly contrasts with the notion that elected representatives should be the primary decision-makers in government, though it does not necessarily imply eliminating elected representatives. Leadership skills for decision-makers are selected on the basis of specialized knowledge and performance, rather than political affiliations or parliamentary skills.
The term technocracy was originally used to advocate the application of the scientific method to solving social problems. Concern could be given to sustainability within the resource base, instead of monetary profitability, so as to ensure continued operation of all social-industrial functions. In its most extreme sense technocracy is an entire government running as a technical or engineering problem and is mostly hypothetical. In more practical use, technocracy is any portion of a bureaucracy that is run by technologists. A government in which elected officials appoint experts and professionals to administer individual government functions and recommend legislation can be considered technocratic. Some uses of the word refer to a form of meritocracy, where the ablest are in charge, ostensibly without the influence of special interest groups. Critics have suggested that a “technocratic divide” challenges more participatory models of democracy, describing these divides as “efficacy gaps that persist between governing bodies employing technocratic principles and members of the general public aiming to contribute to government decision making.”

What does all this mean? Well, the basic summary of a technocracy is a group of elite technical experts (on a particular subject), forming a system of governance based upon that expertise. In this case, it happens to be medical experts, due to the “pandemic”.

What’s interesting about this situation, in relation to consciousness, is that a technocracy lives at the third level of consciousness, known as Dianoia. If we take a look at the image below of the levels of consciousness, we can see that Dianoia (thinking) uses mathematic models for its source of information.

Mathematic models are, in this day and age, generated from computers. As stated in Noetics: The Science of Reaching Man’s Highest Potential, the majority of the general population is at the second level of consciousness, called Pistis. The emerging technocracy is at the third level and thus is in a position to rule what is below.

The only true way to see, with pure vision, what is happening in the world and why, and what must be done, is for one to view the situation from the Noetic (fourth) level of consciousness. This is what we teach…